Here’s what a lot of people hate about “contemporary worship”:
Wasn’t that awful? Wait, what was awful? The fact that there’s a commonly used style, which can be made fun of? That’s true of any religious service — it’s called “liturgy”. What’s awful is to think about sitting through 90 minutes of something like that without any more content than that.
The video reminds me of a comedy routine I heard a long time ago (and can’t remember any other details about), where a couple are arguing by describing the type of comment they would hurl at each other, rather than saying the actual words. Along the lines of
She: “Acid comment about time he’s spent watching sports.”
He: “Avoid responding by bringing up recent shoe shopping.”
She: “Angry rebuttal!”
He: “Ill-considered insult!”
It’s funny to hear them speak analytically about their argument, but it wouldn’t be funny if they were really saying those ugly things to each other. If you put a meaningful message into that video’s worship template, one that touches you or encourages you or heals you, would you have the same reaction? What if those songs were your favorites from “Singing the Journey”? Or if the sermon lifted a cloud from your heart. Is it still funny? No, it’s a worship service, then.
The moral of the story, I guess, is for us worship musicians to hold in our minds that it’s the content that’s important; the container is much less so. When we choose music for worship, it should have a lot more depth than just “this is the song that everyone knows”.